WRISTY business

Who doesn’t love watching the dribbling wizards and the artistry of quick hands, lifts and directional changes? All over the globe, stick handling is celebrated for its tactical brilliance and aesthetic flow. Yet beneath the surface of drag flicks, reverse hits, and rapid ball transfers lies a biomechanical reality that has been largely overlooked in sports injury literature specific to hockey ( field and ice ): the loading patterns of the wrist and hand. While lower limb biomechanics dominate the research landscape—unsurprising given the prevalence of knee and ankle injuries in running‑based sports—upper limb mechanics, particularly in the context of high‑velocity stick skills, remain underexplored (Gracia‑Ibáñez et al., 2023). This gap has direct implications for athlete health, equipment design, and coaching methodologies.

The Biomechanics Behind Key Ball Skills

The wrist is a complex, multi‑articulating joint system capable of fine motor control and force transmission across multiple planes. In the close skills of our game it acts as both a stabiliser and a dynamic driver, modulating grip pressure, pronation–supination, and radial–ulnar deviation to generate ball speed and control trajectory. During drag flicks, peak wrist loading occurs in the final acceleration phase, where rapid ulnar deviation and forearm pronation combine with high grip torque to whip the stick through the ball (López‑de‑Celis et al., 2019).

Reverse hits, by contrast, often involve extreme radial deviation coupled with eccentric forearm muscle activation—conditions that elevate strain on the extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis, and increase compressive forces at the radiocarpal joint.

Repetitive high‑force wrist actions, especially when performed under fatigue or with suboptimal grip mechanics, can contribute to tendinopathies, carpal instability, and even early degenerative changes (Gracia‑Ibáñez et al., 2023). Equipment factors—such as stick weight distribution (balance point), grip diameter, grip(s) density, and surface texture—can modulate these forces, offering potential for design innovation. Each of these attributes come under the microscope at VOITTO as our passion is about guarding health and lifting performance.

Similarly, targeted physical preparation focusing on forearm flexor–extensor balance, proprioceptive training, and controlled end‑range loading may help athletes tolerate the demands of modern stick skills without succumbing to overuse injuries (Verhagen et al., 2010).

Mobility, Activation, Strengthening - uplifts

Addressing the wrist’s high‑velocity, end‑range load patterns requires more than generic conditioning. A layered approach—mobility → activation → strengthening—ensures the joint is capable of achieving optimal ranges, can stabilise under rapid load, and has the strength capacity to tolerate repeated forces (Steinberg et al., 2013). Addressing wrist maximal ROM and strength is another oft-neglected niche conditioning focus that needs sorting if you are to realise the small % gains needed to play a better all round game.

Mobility — Restoring and Expanding Safe Ranges

The Why

A limited range of motion can force compensations at the elbow or shoulder, altering stick path and load distribution (Fenety & Kumar, 1992). In hockey, insufficient wrist extension or deviation restricts technical efficiency.

How to Fix

• Dynamic wrist circles across flexion–extension and radial–ulnar deviation planes. Loaded end‑range holds with a light stick or dowel to bias toward game‑specific positions.

• Forearm fascial glides with a ball to reduce soft‑tissue restriction.

Watch for

Progress pain‑free; avoid aggressive end‑range forcing.

Activation — Priming the Neuromuscular System

The Why

Stabiliser timing is critical for absorbing and re‑directing stick forces during high‑speed skills (López‑de‑Celis et al., 2019). Even with good range, delayed activation leaves the joint vulnerable.

How to fix

• Isometric stick holds in drag‑flick and reverse‑hit grips, light co‑contraction focus. Elastic‑band resisted pronation/supination to wake rotational stabilisers.

• Closed‑chain wrist rocks to engage proprioceptors.

Watch for

Low load, gradual progressions focus on high precision — it’s about readiness for traiining and games, not accumulating unwanted fatigue.Across a tournament, activation needs to occur consistently but load should taper across the weak.

Strengthening — Building Load Tolerance

The Why

Strength creates the protective capacity buffer that reduces overload risk. Balanced development of flexors, extensors, pronators, and supinators minimises asymmetrical strain patterns (Gracia‑Ibáñez et al., 2023).

How to Evolve

• Controlled wrist curls and reverse wrist curls for flexor–extensor conditioning.

• Hammer rotations for pronation/supination strength under lever‑arm load.

• Farmer’s carries with varied grip diameters for endurance and grip integrity.Always a lot of fun and excellent for general phyical preparedness particulalry in aged athletes.
  

  Watch for

  Gradual overload and adequate recovery days for tissue adaptation.
  
  

Weekly Integration

• Pre‑session: 3–5 min mobility + 2 min activation.

• Off‑day/gym session: 15–20 min strengthening, 2–3× weekly.

• Post‑session: Light mobility flush to restore range.

Copyright VOITTO Exercise & Sports Science

Implications for Practice

The underrepresentation of upper limb biomechanics in hockey research is more than an academic oversight ( sure it is not exactly a hot topic) it’s a missed opportunity to protect performance longevity. Integrating motion capture, force‑sensor grip analysis, and electromyography into skill‑specific testing would allow practitioners to map exact mechanical demands. That evidence can shape technique refinement—optimising wrist–elbow sequencing to reduce peak stress—and equipment evolution, ensuring that stick design actively supports joint health.

For the athlete, “grip, flick, repeat” should remain a mantra for mastery, not a forecast of injury. For the coach and designer, it’s a call to blend biomechanics with preparation—marrying art and science to preserve both skill and career.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Fenety, A., & Kumar, S. (1992). Is lower back pain related to the total lumbosacral range of motion? Clinical Biomechanics, 7(2), 131‑137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(92)90035-9

Gracia‑Ibáñez, V., Jarque‑Bou, N. J., & Vergara, M. (2023). Hand and wrist biomechanics. Applied Sciences, 13(24), 13158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413158

López‑de‑Celis, C., Hidalgo‑García, C., Lucha‑López, M. O., Rodríguez‑Sanz, J., Tricás‑Moreno, J. M., & Hidalgo‑García, C. (2019). Electromyographic analysis of forearm muscles during wrist flexion and extension with different grip widths. Journal of Hand Therapy, 32(2), 234‑241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2018.03.004

Steinberg, N., Hershkovitz, I., Peleg, S., Dar, G., Masharawi, Y., Heim, M., Zeev, A., & Siev‑Ner, I. (2013). Range of joint movement in female dancers and nondancers aged 8 to 16 years: Anatomical and clinical implications. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(11), 2453‑2461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513498990

Verhagen, E., van der Beek, A., & van Mechelen, W. (2010). The effect of preventive measures on the incidence of hand and wrist injuries in field hockey players: The HIHO study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(5), 352‑357.