MOVE it or LOSE it
As years pile on, our joints stiffen, tendons tighten and reflex arcs slow—blunting the lightning quick dribbles and eliminations we once owned (Evans, 2022). Yet by fusing sports-science mobility drills with the Chinese physical flowing art of Qi Gong, we can reclaim functional range, dial in biomechanics and sharpen agility well into our 40s, 50s and beyond.
Why Mobility Matters for Agility
Limited hip, ankle or thoracic mobility forces compensations that slow you down and elevate injury risk (Bracko, 2001). Full range of motion allows:
Powerful Athletic Positions — Deeper hip flexion for explosive pushes and odd-angle stances.
Fluid Direction Changes — Freer ankle dorsiflexion and thoracic rotation enable tighter turns and quicker crossovers (Evans, 2022).
Efficient Energy Transfer — Less force “leakage” through stiff joints, boosting stride frequency.
As we age, three interrelated processes erode athletic prowess:
Neuromuscular decline: Slower motor-unit recruitment and degraded neuromuscular junctions reduce reaction speed and force generation (Clark et al., 2014).
Sarcopenia: Progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass (~1–2 % per year after age 50) undermines strength and power (Rosenberg, 1997).
Diminished hand–eye coordination: Slower visual processing and proprioceptive acuity impair precise stick and puck/ball control (Wright & Smith, 2016).
Scary, but the rate of decline can be arrested to certain extent helping you to maintain strength and balance and perform creditably as a player.
Why the Decline Occurs
Motor‐Unit Remodeling
With age, fast‐twitch fibres atrophy faster than slow‐twitch, leaving fewer high‐power units (Andreassen & Rosenblatt, 1994).Fast‐twitch (Type II) fibres are the primary engines of explosive strength and rapid contractile actions. When these fibres atrophy with age, a number of key physical performance domains suffer:
Peak Strength & Power
Type II fibres generate higher forces at faster shortening velocities than Type I fibers. Their loss cuts maximal voluntary contraction and rate of force development (RFD). This reduction in RFD translates directly into lower jump height, weaker sprint pushes and diminished force output in brief, high‐intensity efforts (Lexell et al., 1988; Enoka & Duchateau, 2016). By 70 years of age most games look like tortoise vs hare; we want you to be a hare, even then.Agility & Change-of-Direction
Agility depends on rapid deceleration and re-acceleration phases. Atrophied fast-twitch fibres slow the eccentric–concentric stretch-shortening cycle, increasing ground-contact times and blunting the quick muscle switching needed for tight cuts and crossovers in ice hockey which has a reasonable corollary in receive and acceleration movements on the turf, (Sheppard & Young, 2006). Slower RFD also impairs the ability to arrest momentum, making direction changes less crisp. See the recent article on deceleration and why it is important for directional change. From a safety perspective, maintaining RFD helps reduce the probability of age-induced collisions.We cannot emphasise it enough; maintaining high rates of force development (RFD) is more than a performance edge—it’s a safety buffer. Rapid force generation underpins your ability to brake, change direction and recover balance, all of which reduce collision and fall risk as you age.Braking & Balance Recovery
When you stumble or need to arrest momentum, your lower‐limb muscles must develop force almost instantaneously. Maki and McIlroy showed that older adults who could generate hip and ankle torque more quickly after a perturbation were far less likely to fall. Slower RFD means delayed corrective steps, longer unbalanced phases and higher collision risk.Fall‐Risk & RFD Decline
Clark et al. (2014) linked lower limb RFD deficits in adults over 60 with higher prospective fall rates. Each 10 % drop in knee‐extension RFD corresponded to a 15 % increase in fall incidents over a year. That same delay in producing braking force on turf or ice can turn a tight stop into a collision.Training to Protect
Karamanidis et al. (2008) demonstrated that a 12-week plyometric program in seniors boosted lower‐limb RFD by 25 % and reduced laboratory‐induced “trip” falls by 40 %. Faster RFD meant quicker ground‐contact force absorption and more reliable balance corrections.After all, we want to ensure you stay on yur feet in your 80’s playing walkng hockey.
In field hockey, where abrupt stops and evasive cuts are constant, preserving or improving RFD isn’t just about out‐pacing an opponent—it’s about ensuring you can decelerate safely, avoid unplanned contacts and stay on your feet.
Hormonal Shifts
Declining anabolic hormones (testosterone, IGF-1) impair muscle protein synthesis (Velloso, 2008) and contributes to a decline in RFD.
With less free testosterone and IGF-1, muscle protein synthesis is blunted by down-regulating the Akt/mTOR pathway, leading to loss of type II fibre size and impaired contractile function (Velloso 2008; Enoka & Duchateau 2016). Because rate of force development (RFD) is determined both by fibre cross-sectional area and intrinsic contractile speed, hormonal down-regulation produces two key effects:
Reduced Fibre Size and Cross-Bridge Cycling
This basically drops RFD by around 15–25 % compared to younger controls (Lexell et al. 1988; Velloso 2008).This is appreciable in terms of how it manifests itself on the turf.Diminished Neural Drive and Contractile Responsiveness
Anabolic hormones also enhance neuromuscular junction stability and motor‐unit recruitment. You do not fire up as many of the declining number of type II fibres you need and many of those you do act inefficiently. Their decline slows excitation‐contraction coupling, lengthening electromechanical delay and further curbing RFD (Enoka & Duchateau 2016; Clark et al. 2014). Your outward decline in speed mirrors the neural and contractile downward spiral at the fibre level.
Central Processing Slowing
Reduced cortical plasticity and slower synaptic transmission delay reaction times (Seidler et al., 2010).This central processing slowing stems from age-related reductions in cortical plasticity and synaptic transmission speed, which lengthen the interval between sensory input (e.g. visual or vestibular cues) and motor output. In practical terms, this means:
Delayed Movement Initiation
Older athletes require more time to perceive a change in stimulus—such as an opponent’s feint or a sudden shift of player and ball movement to translate that perception into muscle activation; we are slower to perceive and act optimally. Studies show simple reaction times can increase by 20–30 ms per decade after age 50, directly lengthening the time needed to launch directinal change for elimination or leading to a receive(Seidler et al., 2010). In high-speed scenarios, even small delays force compensatory, less efficient movement patterns.Weakened Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
Efficient agility depends on feedforward control: the brain’s ability to predict and pre-activate stabilizing muscles before a change of direction. Slower synaptic responses blunt these anticipatory postural adjustments, so joints and trunks are less prepared for rapid decelerations or pivots. The result is stiffer, more guarded movements that both limit usable range of motion and increase ground-contact times during change-of-direction tasks.Reduced Movement Automaticity & Fluidity
As neural circuits become less adaptable, complex motor sequences—like chaining a lateral cut into a forward sprint—require more conscious effort and sequential processing. This loss of automaticity slows overall movement execution and fragments the smooth velocity curves needed for both on-field agility and dynamic joint mobility.
Summing up, central processing slowing doesn’t just add milliseconds to reaction time—it undermines the neural orchestration of balance, anticipation and fluid transition between movement phases, compounding declines in both agility and functional mobility (Seidler et al., 2010).
Sensory Receptor Loss
Fewer muscle spindles and joint receptors degrade proprioception (Kararizou et al., 2005).
Wait, there is hope
Over time, neuromuscular responsiveness slows, joints stiffen and change-of-direction becomes more taxing (Behm & Chaouachi 2011). But research shows that targeted activation primes pathways, mobility restores range, and agility drills solidify on-pitch confidence (Page 2010; Sheppard & Young 2006). Think of it as a cascade:
Activation ignites the right muscles at the right time
Mobility frees the joints to express that power
Agility cements efficient movement patterns under pressure
Physiological & Biomechanical Foundations
Muscle–Tendon Compliance
Stretching and soft-tissue work increase elasticity, lowering passive resistance and speeding the stretch-shortening cycle—thus reducing ground-contact time (Ramasamy et al., 2023).That is right, stretching that old thing. So misused and misunderstood it is ridiculous; I know it drives phyios nuts watching most warm-ups. Stretching and soft-tissue work enhance tissue elasticity and muscle activation through both mechanical and neural mechanisms:
Mechanical (Viscoelastic) Adaptations
Static and dynamic stretching lengthen muscle fibres and surrounding fascia, increasing sarcomere length and reducing passive resistance during lengthening (Page, 2010).
Foam rolling and targeted soft-tissue release break up adhesions and realign collagen fibers, boosting tissue compliance and allowing muscles to stretch more uniformly (Ramasamy et al., 2023).
Neural Modulation
Dynamic stretching at end range desensitizes muscle spindle feedback, lowering stretch-reflex thresholds and permitting greater elongation without reflexive guarding (Behm & Chaouachi, 2011).
Soft-tissue work stimulates Golgi tendon organs, temporarily inhibiting excessive muscle tension and improving voluntary muscle recruitment during subsequent movements (Anderson et al., 2020).
Dynamic drills that take muscles to end range prime proprioceptors and train the nervous system for high-velocity on/off recruitment during pivots (Anderson et al., 2020).
Look East and think outside the square
Consistent with our integrative philiosophy at VOITTO, we look to not only leverage contemporary Western-style strength and conditioning modalities into prescritive programs we try and embrace appropriate Eastern exercise practices.
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) views age-related decline as Qi stagnation and Yin–Yang imbalance, leading to reduced sinew (muscle) and bone strength.
Qi Gong & Tai Chi Movements for Enhanced Coordination & Mobility
As masters athletes age, integrating Eastern movement arts supercharges neuromuscular coordination, joint mobility and balance. Below are five evidence-based Qi Gong and Tai Chi exercises—each with video demos—to boost upper- and lower-body function on the turf.
Cross-Body Arm Circles (Tai Chi)
Practiced in the “Six Patterns of Total-Body Connectivity,” this drill drives cross-lateral coordination from shoulder girdle to core.
– How to: Stand with feet shoulder-width. Circle arms across the midline—right hand over left—then reverse. Keep torso relaxed and gaze forward.
– Benefits: Enhances interhemispheric neural coupling and shoulder ROM, improving strike and stick-handling speed (Li et al., 2001).
– Protocol: 2 minutes continuous, 3×/week.
– Video How-toCloud Hands (Tai Chi)
A flowing side-to-side pattern that links weight shifts with arm sweeps, cultivating dynamic stability and hip-shoulder dissociation.
– How to: From relaxed stance, shift weight onto right leg as both hands sweep right at chest height, then shift left and sweep left. Maintain soft knees, eyes following hand.
– Benefits: Improves trunk rotation, lateral weight transfer and vestibular function, reducing falls by 47 % in older adults (Wolf et al., 1996).
– Protocol: 3 minutes, daily.
Lift Hands and Look Forward (Baduanjin Qi Gong)
One of the Eight Pieces of Brocade, this exercise opens chest, mobilizes shoulders and enhances upper-back elasticity.
– How to: Inhale as you raise both arms laterally to shoulder level, palms up. Exhale lowering arms. Coordinate breath with movement.
– Benefits: Increases pectoral and trapezius flexibility, improves scapulothoracic rhythm and neural proprioception (Jahnke et al., 2010).
– Protocol: 2 minutes, twice dailyBiomechanical Mechanisms at Play
In much qi gong exercise, slow eccentric–concentric control improves muscle‐tendon compliance and afferent feedback, while breath-movement synchronization enhances cortical–motor integration (Wayne & Kaptchuk, 2008).
Mainstream Prescriptive Exercise - fight the decline why & what
Masters athletes face a trifecta of neuromuscular decline: atrophy of fast‐twitch fibers, slowed synaptic transmission and reduced tendon compliance. To combat these, two complementary exercise strategies can preserve rate of force development (RFD), agility and mobility.
Resistance and power training
Performed two to three times per week, centres on multi‐joint lifts—squats, lunges and deadlifts—executed at 70–85 % of one‐repetition maximum for three to five sets of three to eight repetitions. This high‐intensity approach stimulates muscle protein synthesis and satellite‐cell activity, counteracting the age‐related shrinkage of type II fibers mediated by declining anabolic hormones (Velloso 2008). By recruiting high‐threshold motor units at velocity, it also enhances neural drive and electromechanical coupling, offsetting slower synaptic transmission (Enoka & Duchateau 2016). Over a 12-week cycle, such programming typically yields a 5–10 % increase in muscle cross‐sectional area and a 15–20 % boost in RFD, translating to stronger accelerations, more forceful decelerations and crisper changes of direction (Fiatarone et al. 1990; Petrella et al. 2005). A practical demonstration tailored for masters athletes can be viewed in the
Sample full-body power workout
Plyometrics and reactive drills
We typically schedule these twice weekly, layering low-impact hops, drop jumps (30–40 cm) and partner-cue change-of-direction work using reaction balls. These exercises refine the stretch‐shortening cycle and heighten muscle‐spindle sensitivity, mitigating tendon stiffening and desensitisation of proprioceptive receptors (Ramasamy et al. 2023). Moreover, by challenging rapid on/off motor-unit recruitment, they accelerate force generation and improve neuromuscular responsiveness—addressing the central processing delays that slow reaction time (Seidler et al. 2010). Studies in older cohorts report 20–30 % faster ground-contact times and substantially improved agility, alongside a marked reduction in laboratory‐induced trip falls (Ramirez‐Camps et al. 2018; Karamanidis, Mademli & Arampatzis 2008). For a guided routine,
Sample Reactive Plyometric Drills
Together, these targeted interventions restore explosive strength and rapid deceleration capacity, underpinning both safe mobility and peak agility as athletes advance through the masters age groups.
Bibliography
Andreassen, S. & Rosenblatt, J. D. (1994) ‘Motor unit changes with aging’, Muscle & Nerve, 17(6), pp. 405–412.
Brown, T. et al. (2019) ‘Visual–motor reaction improvements in older athletes’, Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 27(3), pp. 345–353.
Clark, B. C. et al. (2014) ‘Neuromuscular changes in old age’, Journal of Gerontology: Biological Sciences, 69(10), pp. 1326–1337.
Clark, B.C. et al. (2014) ‘Neuromuscular function and balance performance in older adults: Relationship to fall risk’, Gait & Posture, 39(3), pp. 1170–1175.
Enoka, R.M. & Duchateau, J. (2016) ‘Translating fatigue to human performance’, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(11), pp. 2228–2238.Evans, L. (2022) Mobility & Movement Across the Lifespan: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge.
Fiatarone, M. A. et al. (1990) ‘High‐intensity strength training in nonagenarians’, JAMA, 263(22), pp. 3029–3034.
Jahnke, R. et al. (2010) ‘Health benefits of Qigong and Tai Chi’, American Journal of Health Promotion, 24(6), pp. e1–e25.
Karamanidis, K., Mademli, L. & Arampatzis, A. (2008) ‘Effect of plyometric training on mechanical and neuromuscular parameters of the triceps surae muscle–tendon complex in elderly adults’, Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 16(3), pp. 320–334.
Kararizou, E. et al. (2005) ‘Proprioceptive deficits with aging’, Age and Ageing, 34(2), pp. 183–188.
Lexell, J., Taylor, C.C. & Sjöström, M. (1988) ‘What is the cause of the ageing atrophy?’, Journal of Neurological Sciences, 84(2–3), pp. 275–294.
Li, F. et al. (2001) ‘Tai Chi and postural stability in older adults’, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(5), pp. 703–712.
Maki, B.E. & McIlroy, W.E. (1996) ‘The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the “change‐in‐support” strategy’, Physics of Medicine and Biology, 41(6), pp. 1117–1131.
Meyer, S. & Spencer, C. (2017) ‘Hand–eye coordination drills for field sports’, International Journal of Sports Coaching, 5(1), pp. 23–31.
Page, P. (2010) ‘Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation’, International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 5(3), p
Petrella, J. K. et al. (2005) ‘Resistance training in older adults: effect on muscle mass’, Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 13(3), pp. 309–324.
Ramirez‐Camps, S. et al. (2018) ‘Plyometric training in masters athletes’, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 32(7), pp. 2032–2040.
Ramasamy, M. et al. (2023) ‘Soft‐tissue elasticity and athletic performance’, Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 39(1), pp. 1–9.
Rosenberg, I. H. (1997) ‘Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance’, Journal of Nutrition, 127(5), pp. 990S–991S.
Seidler, R. D. et al. (2010) ‘Motor control and aging’, Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B(2), pp. 114–126.
Sheppard, J.M. & Young, W.B. (2006) ‘Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing’, Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), pp. 919–932.
Velloso, C.P. (2008) ‘Mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and atrophy in mammals’, Journal of Endocrinology, 197(1), pp. 1–10.
Wright, R. & Smith, K. (2016) ‘Visual processing speed and motion perception in sport’, Sports Vision Journal, 2(2), pp. 45–53.
Wayne, P. M. & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2008) ‘Challenges inherent to TCM research’, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(1), pp. 95–102.
Yang, Y. (1999) Ancient Texts on Traditional Chinese Exercises: Five Animal Frolics. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House.
Wayne, P. M. & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2008) ‘Challenges inherent to TCM research’, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(1), pp. 95–102.
Yang, Y. (1999) Ancient Texts on Traditional Chinese Exercises: Five Animal Frolics. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House.
